Person-centred Practice in emergency care: what are the challenges?

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
 29 views
of 29

Please download to get full document.

View again

Description
Person-centred Practice in emergency care: what are the challenges?. Vidar Melby & Donna McConnell University of Ulster. Personcentredness:a prehospital emergency care perspective.
Share
Transcript
Person-centred Practice in emergency care: what are the challenges? Vidar Melby & Donna McConnell University of Ulster Personcentredness:a prehospital emergency care perspective Dr Vidar Melby, UU, Joint Research and Writing with Mats Holmberg, PhD-Student Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, and Professor BO Suserud, Prehospital Research Institute, Borås, Sweden Existing prehospital knowledge
  • Patient experience stressful, injured or ill, awaiting ambulance clinicians, or strapped to chair or trolley, unfamiliar environment, limited space in ambulance. Care is often urgent.
  • Limited research focus on core caring concepts in prehospital emergency care.
  • Melby V. et al. 2012. Patient comfort in pre-hospital emergency care: a challenge to clinicians. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 4, 7, pp 389 - 399
  • Having Sympathetic Presence – prehospital Ambulance patients’ perspectives
  • A development from being lonely to being cared for.
  • A temporary presence.
  • A caring presence.
  • After the presence ends – back into a lonely struggle despite being under hospital care.
  • Quotation: “Then something happens and people come to help you and open up themselves. They talked and cared as I was a family member…You get very warm and happy from that. I got that feeling.” Holmberg,M., Forslund, K., Wahlberg, A.C. and Fagerberg, I. (2013) To surrender in dependence of another; the relationship with the ambulance clinicians as experienced by patients (Submitted) Providing Holistic Care – prehospital Ambulance Nurses’ Perspectives
  • Encounter the person as unique and in a unique situation.
  • The patients feel that the whole caring encounter is managed by the clinicians.
  • Assessments are based on physical, psychological and social perspectives.
  • Quotation: “…that the doors are locked and the oven is switched off if the patient is alone in the apartment. You always have in mind if there are pets, younger people or children in the apartment.” Holmberg, M. and Fagerberg, I. (2010) The encounter with the unknown: Nurses lived experiences of their responsibility for the care of the patient in the Swedish ambulance service. Int. J. Qualitative Stud Health Well-being 5 (2) DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v5i2.5098 Engagement – prehospital Ambulance Nurses’ and Patients’ Perspectives Ambulance Nurses
  • To inform and prepare.
  • Understand the patients’ experiences.
  • Encounter without pre-made assumptions. Quotation: “In a practical way I try to tell the patients what my thoughts are. What will happen next. So that not a lot of things happens that the patient doesn’t understand.” (Nurse)
  • Ambulance Patients Being involved. Being respected and acknowledged. Being important. Quotation: “They talked directly to me they really did. They asked me where I had pain and if they should get the stretcher. They talked in a daily manner and I felt immediately a relief…” (Patient) Challenges in the prehospital Prehospital Emergency Care Context? The balance between medical treatment based on set protocols and personcentred care.
  • Maintaining Core Caring Concepts while effecting Evidence Based Emergency Interventions.
  • Shared Decision Making – are patients happy to relinquish autonomy?
  • Effective Communication – collaboration in care.
  • Innovative Working Culture – freedom to be innovative – working within strict medically based protocols.
  • Exploring prehospital Person-Centredness in the Emergency Department Donna McConnell PhD Student Prof Tanya McCance Dr VidarMelby Dr Paul Slater (adviser) ‘It’s a war zone, people were crying in pain’, prehospital ED patient, Belfast Telegraph, 23.03.12 Pensioner dies alone on hospital trolley U105fm, 2012 ‘We’re at breaking point’, warns Northern Ireland director of nursing , Belfast Telegraph 2012 I saw a nurse just standing there in tears’, ED patient, Belfast Telegraph, 23.03.12 We pay lip service to providing services that are patient and client focused’RCN spokesperson 2012 ‘the current ED system in NI is de-humanising and patients are not getting the quality of care they deserve or that nurses want to provide’ (RCN 2012) Person-centred practice has shown to transform practices for patients...
  • increased choice and involvement in decision making
  • improved quality of nurse/patient engagements
  • staff taking time to get to ‘know’ the person in a more meaningful way
  • staff were more person-centred, in their language and team-work
  • a reduction in ritual and routine
  • ....and staff patients...
  • a shift in values to appreciate caring over the technical aspects of nursing care
  • increased effectiveness of teamwork and workload management
  • improved staff relationships with more effective collaborative working
  • increased personal and professional job satisfaction - less intention to leave posts
  • a more effective use of resources McCormack et al (2010)
  • Themes from the literature patients...
  • Outcomes for patient and relatives
  • what they want vs. what they received
  • Outcomes for staff
  • - Aggression and violence
  • Staffs’ values and beliefs
  • - a culture of ‘worthiness’
  • - medical tasks and technology valued over caring
  • Staffs’ role in managing the service
  • What the literature patients...said patients and relatives wanted in ED
  • Competence of staff
  • Waiting times
  • Pain controlled
  • Provision of information and explanation tailored to needs
  • Small actions which gave physical comfort
  • A family presence
  • Developed interpersonal skills
  • - nurses taking care of the patient and engaging in active listening
  • - being present and fully engaged with them in the moment
  • To be near their relatives and touch or talk to them and know what was happening to them
  • Literature - patients experienced… patients... A feeling of not being considered as an individual and a lack of caring as predominant features (Nyström et al 2003) ..abandoned, exposed, vulnerable, ashamed, ignored, insecure, frightened forgotten or unwelcome (Kihlgrenet al 2004, Gordon et al 2010, Mölleret al 2010, Elmqvistet al 2011). Non-urgent patients received a series of fragmented courtesy encounters and found it difficult to make themselves seen or heard. They projected their dissatisfaction elsewhere and tried to maintain relationships with staff by being ‘good’ patients (Nyströmet al 2003, Nydenet al 2003, Elmqvistet al (2011) Literature - staff experienced… patients...– aggression and violence One nurse described a feeling as if the whole waiting room hated them and stated ‘it just wrecks my spirit’ (Hislop and Melby 2003) Negative consequences include powerlessness, frustration, isolation and vulnerability, anger, anxiety, fear, worry, decreased job satisfaction OUTCOMES
  • Satisfaction with care
  • Involvement with care
  • Feeling of well-being
  • Creating a therapeutic culture
  • At times staff may inadvertently contribute to violence by being overtly authoritative, being judgemental and confrontational, rude and condescending (Ferns 2005, Lau et al 2012, Pich et al 2011) ‘it felt like ‘being kicked in the teeth’ (Pichet al 2011) Pain, anxiety, lengthy waiting times, alcohol and substance misuse, overcrowding, lack of information All experienced ED nurses understood the term ‘eat our young’ … (Baumberger-Henry 2012) Literature - staff values and beliefs… patients...- a culture of worthiness ‘‘You have a positive bag sign, when I see the ambulance pull up and the bag’s on the trolley. I just immediately think, right, you’re in the waiting room’’ (Fry 2012) Staff held a collective belief system beliefs of what was considered ‘true’, ‘right’ and ‘good’ (Fry 2012) Staff experienced frustration with “frequent fliers” and “regulars” (Bergman 2012, Muntlin et al 2010) Sbaih (2002) states this is a reflection of staffs’ desire to keep the department running smoothly rather than a moral judgement of worth. Patients who arrived with trivial conditions, prior expectations of treatment and expectations of preferential treatment breached cultural beliefs (Fry 2012). Literature - staff values patients...and beliefs… - medical tasks and technology valued over caring We are not good at giving nursing care. We are trained in acute care, giving nursing care does not come automatically (Kihlgren at al 2005) Medical treatment is highly valued while nursing care is undervalued…ED nurses are socialised by the social authority and status of medicine (Nyström 2002) Interactions with patients were only initiated when undertaking doctor’s instructions. These nurses defined good trauma care by good technical care (Winman and Wikblad 2004) ‘our patients do not need nursing care, they are just waiting for a medical examination’ (Nyström et al 2003a) Literature – the care environment… patients...- staffs’ role in managing the service Paradoxically nurses have managerial responsibility of the ED but do not have managerial control over medical staff there. When doctors do not come to see the patient’s nurses do not know what to tell them (Elmquistet al 2012). Processes outside the departments impact on the quality of care. ED staff are at the mercy of other departments to allow transfer of patients (Nugus and Forero 2011, Pickard et al 2004) CARE ENVIRONMENT
  • Appropriate skill mix
  • Shared decision making systems
  • Effective staff relationships
  • Supportive organisational systems
  • Power sharing
  • Potential for innovation & risk taking
  • The physical environment
  • Inability to move patients on in the system leads to overcrowding, low staff satisfaction, decreased compliance with clinical guidelines, decision-making errors, an increase in adverse events, and waiting times (Nugus and Forero 2011) Literature –care processes… patients...- staffs’ role in managing the service Efforts to achieve workflow can cause work to become mechanical where interpersonal encounters are reduced to a technical meeting preventing the establishment of a patient relationship on individual level (Andersson et al 2011, Khokher et al 2009) There was no strategy for patient participation. It was offered when staffs’ conditions were met i.e. time to engage with the patient, staffs’ genuine interest and the patient’s medical priority being the current focus for attention (Frank et al 2008) CARE PROCESSES
  • Working with patient’s beliefs and values
  • Engagement
  • Having sympathetic presence
  • Sharing decision making
  • Providing holistic care
  • Due to commitments of other tasks registered nurses found it difficult to provide individualised care leaving basic nursing care to be carried out by unqualified staff (Hwang et al 2008, Bergman 2012). Aim patients... The aim of this study is to explore person-centred practice within the ED environment. Methodology patients... Pilot study patients...
  • Undertaken in August 2013
  • 4 Minor Injury Units
  • 23 registered nurses
  • 19 fully completed questionnaires returned or completed online
  • Methodology patients... Conclusion patients... Watch & Listen patients... https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=a1d78ce6835fe602&id=A1D78CE6835FE602%21161&Bsrc=Share&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&authkey=!AobFl5w9-Diwugc
    Related Search
    We Need Your Support
    Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

    Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

    No, Thanks
    SAVE OUR EARTH

    We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

    More details...

    Sign Now!

    We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

    x