What Should We Expect if the United States Defaults?

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
of 7

Please download to get full document.

View again

Though the immediate effects of a U.S. default can be reasonably well predicted, the significant ripple effects cannot.
  1Center or American Progress | What Should We Expect i the United States Deaults? What Should We Expect if the United States Defaults? By Michael Madowitz October 10, 2013 Te eecs o a U.S. governmen deb deaul will largely depend on how soon heHouse o Represenaives ends is scal brinksmanship. As he 2011 deb-ceiling sand-o showed, he eecs o a poenial deaul will no wai unil he reasury deadline o Ocober 17, and he 2008 nancial crisis proved i is exremely dicul o predic wha will break in he nancial sysem unil i has broken. 1  Wih ha in mind, his issue brie examines wo basic scenarios o a U.S. deaul: one in which he deb ceiling resuls in a deaul or only a shor ime—say, less han one busi-ness day—and one in which he Unied Saes is unable o borrow or a longer period.In eiher case, a ailure o li he deb ceiling in a imely manner will resul in:ãSignicanly increased ineres coss on he naional debãLong-erm negaive impacs or he U.S. economy ãReal, angible, and cosly consequences or everyday AmericansãSevere, unpredicable consequences or he U.S. and he world nancial sysemãMacroeconomic consequences ha increase wih each day he deb ceilingresrains aciviy ã An immense amoun o unpredicable downside risk o he U.S. economy I is dicul o oversae he amoun o risk involved in ailing o raise he deb ceil-ing—no because i is challenging o esimae he cos o each individual consequence, bu because i is so dicul o conceive all o he relevan consequences. Due o he vasuncerainy abou possible oucomes, his issue brie likely undersaes he naure o herisks involved.  2Center or American Progress | What Should We Expect i the United States Deaults?  The known risks to the economy Tere is no ambiguiy abou wheher ailing o raise he deb ceiling will harm he U.S.economy. Wha is ambiguous is how much harm will be done. Te 2011 deb-ceilingsando oers some insigh. A ha ime, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke es-ied beore Congress abou he consequences o ailing o raise he deb ceiling, saying,“I would be exremely dangerous and likely [a] recovery-ending even.” 2  Te simples cos o he economy o pin down is how much long-erm ineres-rae increases will cos axpayers direcly. Like all bonds, U.S. reasury-issued deb,or reasuries, have ineres raes ha refec a risk premium. Te risk premium onreasuries is currenly very close o zero, which means he ineres coss o our naionaldeb are quie low, despie he ac ha publicly held deb is jus under $12 rillion. 3   Alhough mocked or he lack o marke response a he ime, he Sandard and Poor’sdowngrade o he U.S. credi raing in Augus 2011 appears prescien now. S&P saedha “he downgrade refecs our view ha he eeciveness, sabiliy, and predicabiliy o American policymaking and poliical insiuions have weakened.” 4 An increase inhe ineres premium paid on he ederal deb currenly held by he public would cosaxpayers a lo—an increase beween 0.1 percenage poins and 0.5 percenage poins would cos axpayers beween $120 billion and $600 billion over he nex 10 years. 5  As a recen reasury repor noed, here are some direc parallels o he 2011 deb-ceiling sando ha serve as a baseline o comparison or some o he coss o simply approaching he precipice. 6 I we assume ha he curren sando is resolved in a similarmanner as he las one—specically, a he las minue, bu beore any deauls occur—he U.S. economy would sill incur a hos o negaive consequences. Te reasury repornoes ha he S&P 500 Index declined roughly 17 percen in he period surroundinghe 2011 episode, and in he same nancial quarer, household wealh ell by $2.4 ril-lion and reiremen asses ell by $800 billion; i ook six monhs o reurn o pre-crisislevels aer no quie hiting he deb ceiling. 7 Unsurprisingly, he eecs on consumerand business condence were also srongly negaive and ook monhs o reurn o heirpre-crisis levels.I he curren deadline is no me, similar, presumably larger eecs can be expeced.However, a number o complicaions make pinning down an exac cos dicul. 8 While wealhier Americans will primarily be aeced by changes in asse prices, all Americans will be aeced by he ripple eecs in credi markes. Virually every kind o credi used by middle-class Americans—rom credi cards o suden, auo, and home loans—isconneced o ineres raes on reasuries. ypically, he issuers o hese credi producsmake heir pros by charging an addiional ineres spread on op o reasury raes, soan increase in he ineres rae on reasuries alone will drive up borrowing coss.  3Center or American Progress | What Should We Expect i the United States Deaults? During he las episode, he spread on home loans signicanly increased aer he sand-o, wih 30-year xed raes jumping by almos 0.75 percen—abou $100 per monh—or a ypical morgage on a median-priced home. 9 No only would a similar even slow he pace o renances and purchases, bu i he risk premium on U.S. bonds increases, Americans wih adjusable-rae morgages would also see he paymens rise on heirexising morgages.Increased credi coss would have a signican direc eec on he recovery, even inhe case o a very shor-erm deaul. As invesors demand a larger risk premium onreasuries, his cos will be passed hrough o nancing coss in he housing and auosecors. Aer sruggling over he pas ew years, hese secors have recenly regainedseam and have begun o lead he recovery. Due in par o avorable lending condiionsand pen-up demand, auo sales are on pace or heir bes year since 2007. 10 Te housing marke—which oen leads economic recoveries—has been exremely slow o respond o his downurn, in large par because i led he downurn. Forunaely,he marke has markedly improved over he las year, bu he housing recovery is very ragile. I here is a delay in liing he deb ceiling, he bes-case scenario or he housingmarke is no prety. Te addiional risk premium generaed by a deaul on reasury  bonds would be passed ono consumers in he orm o higher ineres raes, and heexperience rom he las sando suggess xed raes would increase by an even largeramoun. Higher raes slow he pace o homebuying and, coupled wih recen increasesin ineres raes, would have a chilling eec on he renances ha have been one o hemajor channels o moneary simulus hroughou he recovery. 11  None o hese coss are rivial, especially a his ragile momen in he economic recov-ery. Deaul will carry long-lived increases in he risk premium paid on reasury bonds, which ler hrough o every ype o borrowing and banking done by Main Sree America. Increased volailiy in asse prices and decreases in consumer and businesscondence as well as household wealh are harmul o an economy a any poin; givenhe curren sae o he recovery, even hese consequences—which are he leas severeand mos easily undersood ones o a emporary deaul—will impose real, signicancoss on average Americans. ‘Good’ news  While a deaul should resul in subsanial shor- and medium-erm declines in U.S.asse values and long-erm increases in ineres cos o he naional deb, i is unlikely heUnied Saes would experience permanen capial figh on he scale ha oher naionshave suered. Many close subsiues or reasuries are oher U.S.-based asses, such ashigh-grade corporae deb and consumer deb.  4Center or American Progress | What Should We Expect i the United States Deaults? Bonds rom oher counries will become more avorable o invesors, bu uncerainy around growh prospecs in Japan, he Unied Kingdom, and he greaer euro areasuggess ha invesors will no fock o any paricular asse. In many ways, he euro isgiving he Unied Saes a buer righ now. I invesors could sill buy deuschemark-denominaed German bonds, i is likely ha even he poliical brinksmanship in heUnied Saes would have driven invesors ou o U.S. reasuries and ino Germangovernmen deb. In some ways, he Unied Saes is experiencing a dividend rominsabiliy in he euro zone. Other potential risks to the economy I he American economy were a ypical one, a deaul would go somehing like his:Invesors would ge spooked, pull capial ou o U.S. socks and bonds, ake losses, andmove heir money o saer asses in oher counries. Back in he Unied Saes, ineresraes would rise and asse prices and he U.S. dollar would all. Impors would becomemore expensive and infaion would rise. Gross domesic produc, or GDP, and employ-men would all. A deaul would be caasrophic, bu in an uterly predicable way. Overime, he all in he value o he dollar would make U.S. manuacuring and expors morecompeiive, leading he economy ou o a deep recession and bringing he counry back o reasonable condiions aer a mere los decade or wo.Te U.S. economy, however, is anyhing bu ypical. In he scenario described above, bondholders are ypical invesors who hold bonds hey perceive o be o relaively highrisk and reurn, so hey are judicious in he ransacions hey srucure based on hese bonds. A deaul causes invesors o ake a hi and sell a a loss, and he deauling coun-ry is le paying higher ineres raes wih less oreign invesmen. Te response is oendeemed a “figh o qualiy,” and invesors end up buying up radiionally sae asses—ypically, reasuries.Since he infaion-adjused reurn o holding reasuries is close o zero, U.S. deb unc-ions less like an invesmen han a source o liquidiy. By ar, he larges concern wihhe House’s brinksmanship is ha he U.S. economy, specically reasury deb, is helynchpin o he domesic and inernaional nancial sysem exacly because he U.S.governmen has a 200-year hisory o never behaving his irresponsibly.Tis sysem’s eec on every American should no be undersaed. Large corporaionsoen make payroll and oher ransacions by using aciliies ha require nondeauledreasury-issued deb as heir oundaion. Many Americans have asses in money-markeunds, eiher direcly or hrough pensions, many o which rely on he saey and liquidiy o reasuries. Every second he Unied Saes is in deaul inroduces unwelcome uncer-ainy ino a very liquid nancial sysem ha relies on a high degree o rus and cerainy.
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks